Evaluation engineering

Agent Quality

Set the checks an agent must pass before release.

We help your team test an agent and document its release decision. The work starts with your current runtime, evaluation tools and incident history. Agent testing extends software testing with repeated runs, model judge calibration and tool-policy checks.

Task setsealed held-outRun ×kindependentDeterministicmay back a gateModel judgereported onlyGatespass or failRecordship or holdA judged measure is reported in the record. It can never satisfy a gate.
  1. Task set: drawn from your workload, held-out split sealed
  2. Run k times: independent repeats, working state reset between each
  3. Deterministic checks: the only measures allowed to block a release
  4. Model judge: reported in the record, never satisfies a gate
  5. Gates: pass or fail, no averaging
  6. Record: ship or hold, with the way back attached
Model judges provide review signals. Deterministic checks and the release approver control deployment.

Your workload

Cases come from the tasks your agent handles and the failures your team needs to catch.

Release approval

Passing checks and a recorded approval are required before deployment.

Client ownership

Your engineers receive the suite, pipeline configuration and operating procedure.

Starting scope

One agent, one evaluation path and one CI pipeline.

Typical duration

Two to three weeks once access and a domain reviewer are available.

Client input

A sandbox, representative tasks, an engineering owner and a release approver.

Fit

Who this helps

Quality teams

You need coverage for variable answers, tool calls and multi-step tasks.

AI platform teams

You need a repeatable policy for prompt, model and tool changes.

Engineering leaders

You need evidence explaining why a release was accepted.

Process

How we work

01

Define the criteria

Agree failure cases and thresholds with your domain reviewer before testing.

02

Establish a baseline

Version the dataset, protect the held-out split and calibrate judges against human labels.

03

Connect the pipeline

Run checks in CI. Exercise failed and held candidates to confirm deployment is blocked.

04

Transfer the workflow

Train the owner to rerun evaluations, review evidence and add regression cases.

Deliverables

What you receive

Evaluation dataset

Versioned cases, rubrics and a held-out manifest

CI policy

Deterministic checks and a separate approval requirement

Agent Quality Record

Baseline and candidate evidence linked to the decision

Runbook

A documented procedure and a trained client owner

Scope

Engagement Options

We quote after reviewing the agent, available evidence and access requirements. Pilot timing depends on those inputs. Model and infrastructure costs are agreed separately.

Typical starting point

Agent Release Quality Pilot

Begin with one agent

Typically 2 to 3 weeks

One agent and one CI pipeline

Install a repeatable evaluation and approval workflow in your repository.

  • Dataset and baseline results
  • Deterministic release checks
  • AQR emission and validation
  • Failed-candidate demonstration
  • Owner training and handover

Evaluation System

Extend the coverage

Typically 4 to 6 weeks

Additional agents and failure cases

Expand datasets, repeated-run testing and adversarial coverage around an agreed baseline.

  • Tool and permission tests
  • Injection and recovery scenarios
  • Judge calibration
  • Regression maintenance procedure

Quality Support

Maintain the workflow

Release reviews and dataset maintenance

Agree a bounded schedule for reviewing changes and adding cases from incidents.

  • Release evidence reviews
  • Calibration updates
  • Dataset changes
  • Engineering support

Questions

Questions

Scope an Agent Release Quality Pilot

Tell us which agent you want to test, what evaluations you run today and who owns the release.

London and San Francisco. Remote or on site.

Agent Engineering